The Thief and the Dogs: Narration

Why does Mahfouz employ stream of consciousness narration in the novel and to what effect?

In his novella, the Thief and the Dogs, Mahfouz breaks away from the old technique of meticulous detail and panoramic narration and employed stream of consciousness narration. Much like 20^th century modernist writers, rather than creating a life story, Mahfouz chose to explore psychological complexity in his novella. Through stream of consciousness narration, the readers were able to experience the world through the protagonist’s eyes and feel the world through the protagonist’s mind. Mahfouz wanted the readers to experience the mental state of Said Mehran, he wanted to capture the sense of paranoia. In doing so, Mahfouz was able to recreate the psychological trauma that he felt under the Nasser regime with its heavy censorship and oppression of opposition. Therefore, the stream of consciousness narration enabled Mahfouz to portray the reality of Egypt at the time from a personal perspective, rather than a superficially ‘realistic’ description if what 1960’s Egypt was like.

Mahfouz’s narration in the novella shifted from third person omnipresent to first person narration as he seamlessly weaved his stream of consciousness narration between his traditional narrations. In choosing his narrative point of view, Mahfouz has manipulated the distance between the novel’s characters and the reader. Through third person narration, Mahfouz is able to provide his intended audience, Arab readers, with the traditional form of story telling which they crave. However, he has also implemented stream of consciousness narration to give the Arab readers a taste of modern literature. Stream of consciousness narration has also allowed him to step away from creating a superficial panoramic view of Egypt under Nasser’s regime and to delve into the mind of the suppressed Egyptian individuals. Mahfouz was able to mend the wounds of the silenced Egyptians through his words; he transcended the level of being a writer and became the conscious of the nation.

Mahfouz’s narration shifts between direct internal monologue, indirect internal monologue, third person narration, and soliloquy.

Direct internal monologue: “Bring in her mother, you mean. How I wish our eyes could meet, so I might behold one of the secrets of hell! O, for the axe and the sledge hammer!”

Indirect internal monologue: “To kill them both--Nabawiyya and Ilish--at the same time, would be a triumph. Even better would be to settle with Rauf Ilwan, too, then escape, go abroad if possible.”

Third person narration: “Once more he breathed the air of freedom. But there was stifling dust in the air, almost unbearable heat, and no one was waiting for him; nothing but his blue suit and gym shoes.

As the prison gate and its unconfessable miseries receded, the world--streets belabored by the sun, careening cars, crowds of people moving or still--returned.”

Soliloquy: Can be seen in chapter fifteen when Said Mehran speaks to the court and claims he is innocent.

"Hey, all you judges out there, listen well to me. I've decided to offer my own defense for myself…I'm not like the others who have stood on this stand before. You must give special consideration to the education of the accused. But the truth is, there's no difference between me and you except that I'm on the stand and you're not."

The beautiful thing about stream of consciousness narration is that it allows the author to create the illusion that the reader is privy to sensations and uncensored thoughts within a character’s mind, it allows readers to feel as though they are in the character’s mind. Stream of consciousness narration ensures that readers understand the protagonist’s internal experience in order to then fathom his external reality. Furthermore, the unity of time and place is neglected in this technique, creating a surreal atmosphere in which the reader feels as though time has been stopped through the power of words from the moment in which they step into the protagonist’s subconscious mind. To me, this is truly a craft because stream of consciousness writers, such as Mahfouz, are able to recreate the slow passing of time in the human mind through their words.

However, stream of consciousness narration has its limitations. The most significant limitation being that as the narrator disappears and the character’s emotions take over, we no longer have the ability to authentically engage with reality that exists somewhere, that vivid experience is taken away from us and it is replaced with a hallucinatory trip into the protagonists mind. Furthermore, there may be a lack of comprehension of the novel particularly when the novel is so convoluted. We loose a realistic sense of character because we no longer have a narrator providing us with an honest depiction of characters or events, we become reliant on how the individual is portraying himself/herself or their own reality.

Stream of consciousness writing elevates novels from being mere stories to becoming almost a psychologically healing medium. Authors stop creating one-dimensional characters and travel into the subconscious and unconscious mind of the character in order to reveal the internal war which the character faces. Traditional novels built their characters by their actions, physical appearance, moral character and what other characters say about them. Modernist writers abolished this technique as it only led to a superficial understanding of a non-realistic character. Modernist writers introduced dynamic, complex, three-dimensional characters. As we saw with Said Mehran, he was a thief and a murderer, yet the reader was able to sympathize with him and see him as a human. Mehran’s psychological projection of Said Mehran is the perfect example of how modern novels are the death of the traditional hero and villain archetypes. Another dynamic character that we have studied is Okonkwo from the novel ‘Things Fall Apart’ by Chinua Achebe. Okonkwo was a tragic hero, unlike the traditional hero, Okonkwo was a character with all the masculine traits he needed in order to qualify as a ‘hero’ in the traditional sense, yet his psychological conflict and his fears plagued his life and caused his life to end tragically.

All in all, Mahfouz has combined realism and stream of consciousness writing to a great effect in his novella. Mahfouz broke away from the old technique of meticulous detail and panoramic narration in order to create an emotional connection with his readers.  

Evaluation of Literature: Study in Translation

Texts and Contexts

Evaluation of Literature: Study in Translation

The Austrian-British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once said, “The limits of my language means the limits of my world.” His words were etched in my mind. I began to ponder upon all the timeless tales, captivating poems, and enchanting thoughts that I have not had access to due to language barriers. I began to crave what non-Arabic and non-English literature could offer me, a new set of eyes that would show me the world in a completely new perspective.

Literary texts enable us to see, feel, and breathe as another. They allow us to connect to different people, different cultures, and different social classes so that we can begin to understand them in a non-superficial way. Ultimately, literary texts enable us to develop our emotional intelligence in order to connect with different people. The IB strives to develop their student’s cultural awareness and acceptance of diversity in order to celebrate our common humanity. Translated texts provide students with the opportunity to travel in time and across the world in order to live as another person, this journey would develop one’s cultural awareness and emotional intelligence. This is why the IB has incorporated the study of translated texts into the curriculum.

In the IB Language and Literature course, the study of translated texts fits into part three of the course titled ‘Texts and Contexts.’ The outcomes of the course are:

Consider the changing historical, cultural and social contexts in which particular texts are written and received.

When reading the translated novel ‘The Theif and the Dogs’ by Naguib Mahfouz we had to have an appreciation of the cultural and social contexts in which the novel was written. This enabled us to understand the symbols, themes and cultural references made in the novel. For example, having an awareness of Sufi Islam and its significance in the Egyptian society enabled me to comprehend the significance of Sheikh Aljunaydi in Saad’s life. Furthermore, the significance of the 1952 Egyptian Revolution is undeniable as Mahfouz was heavily impacted by this event as it occurred during the time in which he was writing ‘The Theif and the Dogs.’ Following the revolution intellectuals were closely watched, the protagonist Said Mehran feels a similar disillusionment and paranoia as intellectuals felt under Gamal Abdul Nasser’s rule.

“At the time [of writing the novella] I was suffering from a persistent and peculiar sense that I was being pursued, and also the conviction that under the political order of the time our lives had no meaning. So when I wrote the criminal [Mahmoud Suleiman]’s story, I wrote my own story along with it.” – Naguib Mahfouz

Demonstrate how form, structure and style cannot only be seen to influence meaning but can also be influenced by context.

Upon gaining an understanding of the social and historical contexts in which the novel was written, I was able to further comprehend Mahfouz’s writing style. The stream-of-consciousness writing technique was implemented as it perfectly reflected how Egyptian people felt under the new government regime in Egypt.

Understand the attitudes and values expressed by literary texts and their impact on readers.

By gaining an understanding of the social context in which the novel was written, I was able to pick up on the attitudes and values expressed in the literary text. I was able to critique this novel through a Marxist lens and a Feminist lens. The Egyptian revolution brought with it many issues pertaining to social class and through a Marxist lens I was able to pick up on Mahfouz’s integrated commentary on the suffering minorities of Egypt. Furthermore, the portrayal of women in the novel revealed a lot about attitudes towards women in 1960’s Egypt. From a feminist lens the sexist insults and slurs reveal gender inequality in the Egyptian society and how women were treated as second-class citizens.

What fascinates me is that, although I am an Arab, upon completing this book I felt I was able to connect to Egyptian culture more than I had been able to before. For example, I am a Sunni-Muslim, however this novel exposed me to Suffi-Islam, a sector of Islam I had known very little about prior to reading this novel. Mahfouz revealed to me the beauty in the cultural differences within Arab culture whereas I had not paid much attention to these cultural differences before.

Literature. Why do we study literature?

Literature is a term that applies to texts do more than simply entertain. Literature is engaging, it has a deeper meaning, and it has a bigger purpose than commercial fiction.

I’ll leave you with another well-known quote that I adore, 

“A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one.” - George R.R. Martin

It is okay for the government to mislead in order to promote security.

The last time I was asked this question, I strongly agreed that governments had the right to mislead their people in order to promote national security. I made the assumption that the average government cares for its people’s well being over its own, however I was wrong. Although there are a modest number of governments that truly do care for their people, many governments care for the country’s economic well being more than anything else. Thus, it is not okay for governments to mislead their people to promote security. Assuming that people will educate themselves and come to understand the political situation of the nation, governments must always be transparent with what it is doing and why it is doing it.

In the documentary, the American government had economic interest in the Gulf region, however rather than telling its people the truth as to why they began a war in Iraq they mislead them and that created a plethora human rights violations under the name of a fabricated ‘justice.’

 “History is written by the victors. People like victory. Once you are victorious you don’t have to justify.” This quote truly resonated with me as it caused me to think about the uniform fashion in which history is told, a multitude of perspectives is rarely found. With that said, it leads me to the second quote which was powerful in its message, "objectivity is like a mirage. “Nothing we perceive is truly objective, everything we know is infatuated by either or own personal bias or the creator's bias. We must be able to make our decisions as to what we want to believe; therefore it is not okay for the government to mislead the people in order to promote security.

Although this completely contrasts my initial id ignorantiam, I believe that governments should not be making assumptions as to how competent its people are and whether they deserve to know the truth. It is their right to know every action that is taken under their names, such as the Iraqi war initiated by the ‘Americans.’

It is important for governments to maintain a level of transparency in regards to their actions as they represent the people on the international field.

Mushrooms by Sylvia Plath

What is the poem about?

• On the surface, the poem is about mushrooms quietly growing in a nighttime forest.
• They poke their heads from the leafy, pine-needled forest floor and eventually sprout from the cracks in a city sidewalk.
• The poem is an extended metaphor.
• The mushrooms seem to represent an oppressed population- most likely women- who are mounting a quiet revolution.
• At the end of the poem, we’re told that, by morning, they’ll have the respenct they deserve. 

Personification:

• Plath’s personification of the mushrooms can be seen as a way of expressing the plight of women in the 1960’s. The ‘perfectly voiceless’ fungus represent the silent but growing majority of women, hidden in darkness, gradually, quietly, pushing until they ‘inherit the earth.’

Structure:

•  Regular stanzas – it is almost and though Plath has crafted every aspect of this poem to mimic or reflect the 1960’s woman. All the stanzas are the same, identical, they behave perfectly and as we expect them to – the lack of spontaneity reveals the societal expectations of women at the time. 
•  All stanzas – the increasing power of women and their fight for equality.
• Stanzas being the same length/ equal represent the equality women will eventually have.
• Syllables on every line – allows us to hear and feel the restraints the mushrooms and women are pushing and fighting against.
• Free verse – the mushrooms growing. Also the growing independence of women and how they no longer rely on men.

Annotations:

Additional helpful resources:

http://genius.com/2903102

'Tulips' by Sylvia Plath- Practice IOC

Coriolanus Individual Oral Commentary Outline:

Introduction:

The passage presented is from the play ‘Coriolanus’ written by William Shakespeare. Through this work of literature, Shakespeare explores the physical and internal implications that are inflicted due to the political shift from monarchy to democracy.  Shakespeare studies the influence of power on people and provides a social commentary in which he advocates the distribution of power.

This passage is situated in act one scene one of the play. Preceding this passage, the citizens of the Capitol revolt against the government due to high corn prices and ask the Senators to restore their basic rights. Following this passage Aufidius plans to go to war against Caius Martius.

In this passage Caius Martius talks to Menenius talk about the plebeians revolution. Caius Martius reveals his disgust with the plebians’ attitudes and their lack of respect for authoritative figures.

This passage is significant as it characterizes Caius Martius and reveals his hubris. This passage pushes forward the theme of power and the abuse of power against the weak.

This commentary will follow a sequential analysis...

Section one (lines 1-26):

• Caius Martius insults the Second Citizen.
• Caius Martius proceeds by insulting all the plebeians and revealing how they disgust him.
• Caius Martius finds out that the plebeians are revolting against the government due to the high prices of corn.
• Animal Imagery: “You Curs” “Where he should find you lions, finds you hares; where foxes, geese.”
•  Antithesis “Where he should find you lions, finds you hares; where foxes, geese” “Coal of fire upon the ice, or hailstone in the sun.”
• Sarcasm “We have ever your good word.”
• Foreshadow: “Your affections are a sick man’s appetite.” Rome has a diseased body politic. Coriolanus may be the disease that Rome, however he blames the plebeians.

Section two (lines 27-41):

• Caius Martius says that through revolution the plebeians are only hurting themselves and making themselves prone to abuse by foreign invaders.
•  Threatening tone.
• Warfare is associated with nobility.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, in this passage Shakespeare characterizes Coriolanus through his use of imagery and dialogue. This passage is significant to the play as it foreshadows the downfall of Rome and characterizes the play’s main character, Caius Martius.